How to Manage Someone Who Thinks Everything Is Urgent
We’ve all been in situations in which we couldn’t wait for a
slow-moving or overly cautious employee to take action. But at the other
extreme, some employees have such a deep need to get things resolved that they
move too quickly, or too intensely, and make a mess. They may make a bad deal
just to say they’ve made it, or issue a directive without thinking through the
ramications just to say they’ve handled a problem decisively.
The problem is that these employees may have been praised in
the past for this very behavior, even when it results in mistakes that they can
then heroically “save.” And when urgency is a part of the organizational
culture, it may feel like a requirement to move fast, whether you’re a leader
or a frontline employee. At a basic level, because urgency generates so much
activity, it can be hard to recognize it as an organizational problem. But it’s
a signicant one. Executives report that
thousands of dollars are lost every business day when decisions are rote or
arbitrary because of pro forma, nonstrategic decision making.
And yet, despite the damage that unaddressed urgency can do,
urgent employees are usually some of the most committed and are often very
productive. Here are steps you can take to mitigate the negative impact of
their urgency, to help them focus their intensity on the right targets and
ensure they make better long-term decisions before taking action
Help them recognize their impact on others. Show how
collaboration pays o for everyone — including them. One assistant VP I worked with was correct
about what needed to be accomplished, but he was driven to “get it over with” and “put it behind” him, and
often operated unilaterally to get things done. Because he was only urgent
about his own goals and tasks, he was perceived as a bad partner and not a team
player. I encouraged his manager to affirm the importance of collaboration, and
to ask him specically to prepare the equivalent
of “impact statements” as a way to force
interaction and cooperation with other parties. His manager also learned to
stop praising him for every accomplishment and to praise him instead for the
process — joint planning, coordination, and interdepartmental success.
Encourage them to identify all the consequences of their
actions. It’s typical for urgent employees to see only the upside of acting
quickly, not the negative eects of
acting too quickly. A VP at a nonprot client
had a history of making decisions hastily and without sufficient data. These
decisions led to some unfortunate employee layos,
despite her having been asked to consult with others and weigh such decisions
carefully. After we had her rehearse the termination conversations with
employees she had just hired, and we dramatized the impact the termination
would have on them as individuals and on their families, the exposure to the
pain she was causing nally got her attention.
Pair them with long-term thinkers. Eective
interventions let urgent employees actually experience the success that comes
from a more deliberate, thoughtful approach. A senior sales specialist brought
in many deals because he was both diligent and intense. But he was so eager to
get the deals that, as soon as a prospect indicated even a tentative yes, he
would oer anything they seemed to want to close
their initial order rather than strengthening his own presentation to get
better value. After he brought in several new accounts that were signicantly smaller than potential or had too many strings
attached, his management paired him with a more cerebral colleague who excelled
in research and planning. The combination of high energy and careful planning
increased the number and size of deals.
Kaynak:
Harvard Business
Review Digital Articles. 8/2/2017, p2-4. 3p.

Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder